200-Word Short #1

4 Jan

So today I embark on doing more prewriting, and in my world, I believe that everything should be with an end product in mind. So I’ll be working out characters and situations that aren’t in my current book but existed before the book or concurrently to someone else who’s not in the book (perhaps an English shepherdess drinking from a ladle of water in the middle of a cool July day).

Here’s my prompt. Will think about what said prompt means and then barf up two hundred words in a day or two. Will try to think of something better than English shepherdesses (shepherdi?).

In the Name of Research: David Copperfield (The Illusionist, Not the Orphan)

9 Nov

In the name of research, I Googled how David Copperfield made The Statue of Liberty disappear. (Anyone else remember that? I think I remember the previews for it, but I never watched it. I think a new episode of Full House was on.)

But here’s how he did it, in an article titled How did David Copperfield Make the Statue of Liberty Vanish?

As a sidenote, the Husband and I got to see his act in Vegas a couple of years ago. Let’s just say that we’ve never paid so much to see someone so arrogant do so little.

~Susan

Present vs. Past vs. What Will Give Me the Smallest Ulcer

8 Nov

So I had a quandary. (Was it a quandary, which in my mind’s eye relates to the number four? I’m probably totally off-base, but still, I’m allowing myself to get all nerdy with the word. To continue the Nerd-fest, I guess the real issue is about two things–so is this a bi-ary? Does this make me a nerd AND a bit touched in the head, too?)

So this bi-ary is about present vs. past tense. In the first four manuscripts I wrote (two of which are shelved in a folder in Dropbox to one day be dusted off and attacked by Susan, The Advanced Writer), I wrote in past tense. There was nothing but past tense even considered for these books. The battle between first and third person raged, but never one between tenses.

(Author Epiphany: Hey! I got my quandary!!!)

With this latest manuscript, however, I’ve been wanting present tense like a two-day-old wants his mama’s nipple. I just can’t imagine another voice. But see, I’m savvy. I know what sells more easily. Past tense, past tense, past tense.

But my heart wanted present tense, present tense, present tense. And now I’m 25000 revised words into The January 2012 Book (the date I plan to send it to my agent–it’s good to give it a title that has your goal stated in it!) and it’s all present tense. And as I re-read it, I’m thinking:

Maybe I need to go past tense.

I hate myself.

And so I went online to try to make a cerebral decision. (Because the heart is sometimes an idiot.) And here are the great sites I found to help me:

Grammar Girl:

John Updike’s novel Rabbit, Run, published in 1959, is sometimes thought to be the first novel written in the present tense (2), but Updike credits two other writers as coming before him: Damon Runyon and Joyce Cary. Nevertheless, I found Updike’s comments about his state of mind when he was choosing the present tense to be illuminating. I’ve heard people complain that present tense novels sound like screen directions, and for me, it IS easier to imagine the sentence Jack walks into a diner just south of Japantown as the opening sentence of a screenplay than as the first sentence in a novel. And here’s what Updike had to say about Rabbit, Run back in 1990:
      It was subtitled, in my conception of it, ”A Movie”; I imagined the opening scene as something that would happen
      behind credits, and I saw the present tense of the book as corresponding to the present tense in which we experience the
      cinema (3).

The Dissertation:

THE CON OF PRESENT TENSE: The majority of writers utilize retrospective narration in first-person novels because reflection generally allows for greater interpretative power by the narrator, therefore seemingly reducing the limitations of first-person voice. The idea is that some distance of perspective is needed for analysis. More specifically, it is difficult for one to fully understand the significance of an experience when he or she is in the midst of it.

THE PRO OF PRESENT TENSE: Because thoughts are presented seemingly in close conjunction with their conception, the narrator does not present finite conclusions and generalizations about him or herself. This is not to say that the narrator-protagonist does not interpret what happens, but writers present the protagonist’s interpretations as they occur and change. In other words, these novelists re-create through immediate narration the process of identity development. The result is fluidity in the form and by extension in the characterization. This flexibility not only allows for the subversion of narrative conventions; it is also used by writers to develop protagonists who reject limiting societal expectations of behavior (those based on gender, class, race).

The Fusspot in The Telegraph:

“I just don’t read present-tense novels any more. It’s a silly affectation, in my view, and it does nothing but annoy.” Philip Pullman

And that’s some of the better research. The cerebral side of me says “Past tense Susan. Don’t be a dunderhead. Adults don’t want to read books that are as whip-lash fast as a movie.”

But The Hunger Games was whiplash fast. And it was turned into a movie. And Katniss was a Societal Reject. And, yeah, it was in That Awful Present Tense.

Was this book a fluke? Can only the Great Suzanne Collins get away with it?

Oy.

I still don’t know. Anyone got an opinion? I think I’m giving myself an existential ulcer.

~Susan

High-Stakes Drama: Welder-Slash-Exotic-Dancer vs. Out-of-Control Train

21 Sep

There are many times in my life when I’ve run across a compelling story that kept me involved from the very beginning to the bitter end.  We’ve all been there, glued to every word, panting as we delve further into the psyche of characters who painfully discover they can’t get what they want.  A good story states the main character’s goals at the onset, but this doesn’t always make a great story.   A great story, in my opinion, takes what matters most to a character and yanks it away like a dangling carrot in front of Bugs Bunny after he’s been on a month-long carrot fast and makes him work hard to get even a bite out of it.  But how do writers accomplish this in a flawless, non-manipulative way?   I am going to compare two unrelated films, Unstoppable and Flashdance, and look at their common thread:  high stakes, which is a device to keep audiences hooked.

In the film Unstoppable, it is clear from the very beginning that two conflicting characters, played by Denzel Washington and Chris Pine, will have to join together to save a city from disaster.  The twist is, instead of a runaway bus, plane, or rocket, a chemical-laden train is threatening the lives of thousands of innocent people.  Chemicals + out of control train + lots of death = a good return on investment, right?  

I’m in the “no” camp.  Here’s why:

The stakes are high – a train, with broken brakes accidentally slips into full throttle (I’m trusting the writers checked with the Pennsylvania railroads to make sure this could actually happen), is laden with toxic/fatal chemicals and is thrown on a collision course with a rural city.  We see two railroad engineers at odds with each other before the train runs off.   We get a glimpse of their personal lives – Denzel accidentally misses his daughter’s birthday (how many times have we seen that one?), and Chris Pine struggles with his spousal relationship (another tired re-run).  We see a school field trip full of elementary-aged children climbing a train that will get in disaster’s way, their little faces filled with awe and excitement.   We see a chubby underdog railway worker jump out of the train to fix the railroad’s switching mechanism and not only not get it to work, but he can’t jump back into the train to stop it.   It’s a good start in creating a recipe for a catastrophe.

So, why didn’t this movie hook me? The trick to getting people involved in a story isn’t always action-packed adventure and the threat of chemical annihilation.  It’s not even about throwing children into potential acid baths.   It’s all about the main characters.  As Anne Lamott, one of my all-time favorite heroes, states, “Find out what each character cares most about in the world because then you will have discovered what’s at stake.”  Denzel’s daughters and Chris’ wife aren’t even in the runaway train’s path—and did we even care about them in when we saw them at the start?  Sure, saving other peoples’ lives is still important, but what the film’s characters care about most is sitting far, far away, off-screen.   This doesn’t get me involved.  It has me running away to clean off the mold on my shower head.

On the flip side, let’s look at Flashdance.  There are no physical high stakes in the story.  No danger of school children dying or a town getting wiped off the face of the earth.  Jennifer Beale can’t even hold a candle to Denzel Washington’s acting abilities, yet her story made a far deeper impact with viewers. (After all, how many people have heard of and have warm fuzzies about Flashdance? Okay, how many have heard and have warm fuzzies about Unstoppable. Yeah, exactly.)   Why?  Okay, part of it was sex appeal.  Jennifer’s hot and she busts (actually, her double busts) some pretty alluring moves.  But that’s a discussion for another day.

What made us care about Flashdance was seeing how the main character wanted to be a dancer, and not just any dancer – she wanted to go to the best dance school in the nation.  We saw her working hard to accomplish her goal, slaving all day at a steel plant and pouring water on herself at night.  She didn’t have to save peoples’ lives, or even care about her rural Pennsylvania town.   Instead, she sweated, agonized, and struggled to fight barriers set up to keep her dream from happening. 

She loses one person in her life – an old lady whose only gifts were encouragement and a pair of moth-infested ballet slippers, but we still care.  Why?  Because the stakes in the story are high for her.  Not high for anyone else, just her.  She loved the old lady, who ended up being the only person in the world who truly loved her.  Jennifer’s character suffers a series of losses which seem small in comparison to an out-of-control train barreling toward innocent people (including children!), but we can’t stop watching because we want to see if she accomplishes her goal.  When her radiator breaks, she cries over the puddle of water on the ground and we cry along with her, not because she’s a good crier, but because we’ve been taught to care. WE CARE.

Critics panned Flashdance for many reasons, but it was still the bigger blockbuster of the two (worldwide gross was $227 million compared to Unstoppable’s $169 million, adjusted for inflation). Both films offered high stakes – one had a town facing impending doom, while the other offered the loss of a much-cherished dream.   The first sounds much more exciting, but since none of us have the time to waste on two-dimensional characters who we don’t care about—and truth be told, we weren’t even invested in the children who were maybe possibly about to die–Flashdance won the hearts of millions while Unstoppable isn’t even a movie we can remember the name of a month after we’ve watched it.

I’m willing to watch a movie that has a character wanting to hold the first grasshopper Olympics in his bedraggled sinkhole of a yard—I just need to know that he cares about his goal, that we know why he’s fighting so hard for that goal, and that’s he’s willing to risk tooth and nail to achieve his goal.  We all deserve to see a character’s whole enchilada – the quirks, the losses, and the demons.   We want to see people just like ourselves risking their guts over their dreams, whether they’re big or small, to make them happen. 

Now that’s what I call great high-stakes drama.

~Stacey

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

How To Use an iPad as a Writer (Step 1: Delete Words with Friends)

4 Sep

We got the iPad back in April. Maybe it was May. (We moved and ended school years around that time, so I’m just glad I can narrow it down to two months.) When we got the iPad, I thought to myself, “Okay. Yay. I can figure out a way to up my productivity as a writer on this thing.” My lagging productivity has been an issue as of late, but it’s not because of a lack of tools. I had a Mac mini. A Netbook. About 20 spiral notebooks (each one bought with the hope that this one was going to be the glossy, pristine book inspiring me write 50 pages of longhand a day–instead, each notebook lost its luster as soon as I sullied the first page).

My thoughts were scattered all over the place, and the Mac mini, Netbook, and 20 notebooks were testament to the thousands of thoughts on multiple stories that were going nowhere. (If I believed in ADD, I would say I have it.)

And then the iPad came into my life. And it did the exact opposite for my productivity levels. I found Angry Birds. iBooks. Words with Friends. (Damn you, Words with Friends! Damn you to the frozen world of Pluto and beyond!)

After the initial addiction to New-Ways-to-Procrastinate started to fade, I began to focus. I keyword searched in Apple’s App store for “productivity” and “writing.” I found Evernote; I still have no idea how to work it. Neu.Notes; it’s the best app for taking notes, but all I’ve done on it is keep score during card games with the in-laws. Documents; might as well just use iPad’s Notes. Writer’s Studio; my four-year-old has gotten more use out of it than I have.

But then, I started to find Apps that actually worked:

  • Noterize: The best App (that I’ve found) that lets you write on PDFs. As in PDFs of your WIP. As in “Save some squirrels from being homeless by using Noterize to edit your work.”
  • Instapaper: This App lets you save the webpages you’ve found and read them later. As in, I don’t need to keep 50 tabs of research open anymore, effectively slowing my computer down to the pace of a snail surfing a drip of molasses.
  • Scripts: This App is for the iPhone, but it’s a great way to outline scenes in a fast way that gives new energy to the brain fart you may be having over “What next?”
  • iAWriter: I love this App. LOVE it. It gives you a keyboard that has more punctuation (hello quotation marks–how I’ve missed you!) on it than the iPad default.
  • Note Cards: It’s exactly what it sounds like: virtual note cards. And for every writer who uses Scrivener on their computer, you’ll appreciate a mobile corkboard.
  • WordPress: Another convenient App when you don’t have a computer around. You can write a new blog post from your iPad where you call the agent that sent you a form rejection a butthead. I’m using the App right now, in fact.
  • Dropbox: It syncs with my computers and gives me the latest version of my story. This means no more making squirrels homeless by printing out pages before I go to my daughter’s dance class/gymnastics class/other classes that having me gossiping with the other bored moms unless I bring work with me. Also, I can use it with Noterize and iAWriter to really make the most of the writing I’ve done and the Apps I have.
  • Nook, Kindle, and iBooks: I use all three to find writing books when I need inspiration (although, on the flipside, this can hinder productivity, so give yourself time limits). And with Kindle, you can copy and paste sage words you find.

But it’s not just Apps that have improved my productivity as the ADD writer. (If I believed in such a thing.) There’s also:

  • Having a PDF (or .doc) of an old version of my WIP up as I work on new pages where everything’s new except for that one paragraph of pure genius in the old version.
  • Keeping my website up as I update it on the computer. Not only do I not have to toggle between screens on my computer, but I also get to see what it’s looking like on a mobile device.
  • Buying a stylus. That rubber-tipped “pen” helps me write on my PDFs and, in general, keep the grease smears to a minimum.

Yes, I do have the People App and I have MyPad. But these aren’t the timesuckers that one App ended up being: Words with Friends. If there’s such a thing as Beelzebub, then that app is it, and I have since exorcised it from my life.

~Susan

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.